Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "LEGO Star Wars: The Freemaker Adventures."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

LegoClassicStarWars

Kick some brick in I through VI!

LEGO Star Wars: The Freemaker Adventures is within the scope of WookieeProject: LEGO, an effort to develop and maintain in-universe and out-of-universe articles about LEGO-related Star Wars topics.

If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.

Non-canon

Is there a source that confirms this to be non-canon? I'm just asking because it seems a few bits of LEGO Star Wars content seem to be confirmed as canon. --Kyle03 (talk) 19:57, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

  • LEGO is canon to itself, but not to the official Star Wars story. Leland Chee calls it "LEGO canon" - see here. For something in LEGO to be canon to the official Star Wars saga, it'd have to appear in an official Star Wars story. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 20:01, March 30, 2016 (UTC)
  • It is slightly more complicated than that. As Bob Roth and Bill Motz put in this IGN article:[1]

"LEGO Star Wars is its own unique universe," Roth said, adding that Freemakers follows Star Wars continuity, if that continuity was "reenacted by a kid playing with his toys."

“I like to think of it as 'Canon Paraphrase.' Motz added.

...

"We work with the Story Group, and we work with a woman named Carrie Beck, and she has this smile," Roth said, "and when we pitch things to her and she smiles and says, 'You can't do that,' we know that we've stumbled into Rogue One, Episode IX -- who knows what. But seeing The Force Awakens before we started, I was like, 'Oh, that's why we couldn't do that one story!'"

"We were like, 'And then they find Luke Skywalker's original lightsaber --' and she'd be like, 'Mmm, no,'" Roth laughed.

    • Now we can't put this in the article itself(at least, not without further clarification), but what he's saying could range from: "No, but they're nonetheless keeping us from hinting at or spoiling anything that comes later in Canon" to: "Yes, but obviously not in the way portrayed in the show". Do the Freemakers exist in their own little corner of the Galaxy? They probably do. If they got involved in a Dark Jedi Imperial agent's search for a powerful crystal saber? That's a whole lot less likely. Unless somebody else brings it up or cameos them in a later non-Lego work, they remain what TV Tropes calls Canon Foreigners. --SAMAS (talk) 13:11, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Ended?

Anyone know if the series will continue beyond 13th episode? There's no talk of any more...--Kohtohyah (talk) 06:02, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

  • We should wait for Disney to announce. I don't know but they would announce it later this year or even next year. So, I would say wait and see. Andykatib 07:32, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Sequel to Rebels

That seem right? Rebels seems to take place between Revenge of the Sith and Rogue One while Freemaker Adventures seems to occur between New Hope and Empire Strikes back?

Just because previous Lego serirs were called non-canon, does that mean thy explicitly said all future Legon are non-canon? Has FA explicitly been called non-canon by Lucas? talk2ty 15:42, October 30, 2017 (UTC)