Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Fulstar plate."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

GA-Former

Fulstar plate is a former Good article. Please see this article's entry on the AgriCorps page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
September 13, 2010 Comprehensive article nomination Failure
September 16, 2010 Failed Comprehensive article nominee
September 16, 2010 Good article nomination Success
September 24, 2010 Good article by Darth Culator
February 10, 2017 Good article review Removed
March 8, 2017 Former Good article
Current status: Former Good article

Canon ?

Please tell me this isn't canon. --Admiral06 05:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Having heard the audio version that accompanies the book, I can say that while the child-friendly prose is grating to the adult ear, there's nothing inherently abhorrent to canon in it. jSarek 06:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't know, having a colour-coded system doesn't seem to mesh too well with the idea of maintenance and astromech droids, who are of course colour-blind, not possessing human sight and all, being able to repair hyperdrives. Maybe I'm clutching at straws here, but I just don't see how a plot device whose sole function is a kid's learning tool can be considered alongside dedicated reference books in terms of canon. Can we at least put an ambiguous template up? The 95 Headhunter (radio) (mission log) 18:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Color blind? Do you have a source for that? As far as I know, astromechs have the full range of Human visual perception and then some. Since lots of important repair functions are color coded on Earth (wiring being the best example), I don't think it's improper for that to also be the case in Star Wars. jSarek 18:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
        • Admittedly no, I don't have a source. Maybe I've just got the idea in my head because the first-person view for T3-M4 is blue-coloured (and therefore there is no distinction). You make a good point about the colour-coded wiring as well. Still, I'm sure that there are species like the Verpine (who I believe see in UV) who would have problems with the system. Ah well, like I said, I was probably just clutching at straws. The 95 Headhunter (radio) (mission log) 16:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
          • Well, T3-M4 is 4,000 year old technology by the time in which this story is set. As for color coding and aliens, I imagine they can only do so much to allow cross-species compatibility, and the majority of species seem to have visual ranges roughly equal to those of Humans. In the specific case of the Verpine, who might well get special treatment due to their dominance in the fields of repair, there may also be UV tags or other UV- visible identification on the plates invisible to us. jSarek 22:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
            • Please, let's maintain some credible perspective here. I know someone will try and disagree with me, but no this is not canon. Just because this kids' learning book/tape was licensed to use the Star Wars name and characters in their product, does not entitle it to the same canonical weight as the rest of the Expanded Universe. Maybe you can argue that point on purely technical grounds, but trying to somehow justify anything introduced in a preschool colors and shapes learning book as meaningful canon is just ludicrous. Frankly, not flagging this as ambiguously canon is embarassing. IMHO. Xavic Kae 15:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)