Talk from Harland Sanders
What's the matter Colonel Sanders? Chicken? Adamwankenobi 21:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA. Oh, this is great. (Ulicus 23:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC))
Talk from Pizza Hut Girl
uhh...this article is fanon Imperialwalker 22:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Turn to the dark side!!
- No it's not. -- I need a name (Complain here) 22:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- so since when is pizza hutt in the star wars universe,huh?? Imperialwalker 22:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Turn to the dark side!!
- WHAT??? Imperialwalker 22:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- You do know what "ambiguously canon" means, right? --Redemption
Talk 23:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- You do know what "ambiguously canon" means, right? --Redemption
- no Imperialwalker 23:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- uuhh................Imperialwalker 01:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- This article is ambiguously canon. This must be a joke :D :D :D --Sompeetalay 17:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- So was the Pizza Hut girl actually a mascot? Or something for this Star Wars thing only? I do not recall her, ever. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:20, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia indicates only that she appeared in the Star Wars ads. So it would seem most likely she was created only for this. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:27, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
- If I recall correctly, she was in commercials around that time, but she wasn't so much a mascot as a generic employee providing quality service like you'd see in any number of fast food commercials. When Defeat the Dark Side happened, this generic employee was the closest thing Pizza Hutt had to a mascot, so into the ads she went. jSarek (talk) 08:07, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia indicates only that she appeared in the Star Wars ads. So it would seem most likely she was created only for this. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:27, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
Split
I say we need to split the character profiles into three separate articles. *Holds back laughter* VT-16 12:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- They originally were seperate, but then they were voted into being merged into this article. -- I need a name (Complain here) 13:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Canon Status
Can someone explain to me how this was determined to be non-canon? And don't give me the whole "because it's obviously non-canon." Is there a source, either from Leland Chee or anyone official, that says that this wasn't meant to be canon because according to Wookieepedia's policy all toys are considered canon so I don't know how this one is automatically out. (RangerSmith (talk) 08:10, November 9, 2012 (UTC))
- I must agree. Absurd as it may be, a source is required to declare something non-canon. --{{SUBST:User:AvatarRokusGhost/Sig}} 05:03, January 6, 2013 (UTC)