Plagueis
Ancient sith? Is this not same Tenebrous from Plagueis book? --Goodmind (talk) 07:05, December 21, 2019 (UTC)
- It is, that's why it's linked via the Eras template. Zed42 (talk) 07:08, December 21, 2019 (UTC)
He is ancient―from a certain point of view./// Tenebrous/Legends is different from Tenebrous/Canon. The IX Visual Dictionary says that Tenebrous is "ancient", hence the use of the same word in this article. - - -
OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 15:22, December 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Then we need confirmation that he is the same character, or Legends tab wouldn't make sense here, if he's ancient Sith from 1000+ BBY --Goodmind (talk) 15:28, December 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Ancient can be a subjective word, there's nothing that saying ancient means 1000+BBY--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:15, December 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Then we need confirmation that he is the same character, or Legends tab wouldn't make sense here, if he's ancient Sith from 1000+ BBY --Goodmind (talk) 15:28, December 22, 2019 (UTC)
Dead?
Since Plagueis is confirmed to have trained "The Stranger," if the Stranger was Plagueis' true apprentice Tenebrous is clearly dead-unless Plagueis broke the Rule of Two. How does this work? -45.19.130.201
- We don't know the full circumstances yet so we'd be better to not add anything until confirmation Lewisr (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Tenebrous took Plagueis as an apprentice by 132 BBY
Since Plagueis trained The Stranger, shown in The Acolyte, which takes place in 132 BBY, it makes sense that Plagueis was taken as an apprentice by Tenebrous at some point before 132 BBY. Can this be added into the article? If so, how? -45.19.130.201