Spelling
One L or two? Duff name either way, though :P --Fade 11:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Two Ls...now corrected. And for the name...blame Abel G Pena. :p QuentinGeorge 11:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- How come I've never heard of this guy until now? Smelled like fresh fanon. -- Riffsyphon1024 17:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Redirect
- Why the redirect? We have Darth Bane, Darth Vader and Darth Sidious all at those respective pages. This should be back at Darth Millennial. QuentinGeorge 07:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Do you suppose that Darth Millenial could be Zannah's apprentice? Do any pictures of this character exist?
- Nope, no pictures. And we have no real information on this Dark Lord. Hopefully future material will reveal more - I'm hoping for a Pantheon of the Dark Lords feature in Insider.... - Kwenn 20:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Name meaning
- millennial - A span of one thousand years, A hoped-for period of joy, serenity, prosperity, and justice. relating to a millennium or span of a thousand years
New info coming soon
- Abel G. Peña is currently working on a backstory on Darth Millennial and possibly an illustration of him. Be prepared. DarthMalus 14:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Mutant
Abel G Pena has stated in his blog that Millennial is a three eyed mutant, STOP changing it back.
Infobox
I've been thinking, should'nt Millennial's infobox be Dark Jedi rather than Sith. Afterall he left the Sith to found his own religion, and we don't consider any members of the Dark Force to be Sith, they all have Dark Jedi infoboxes so should'nt the same be for their founder? Jayce Carver
InfoBox
no becuz, they r Sith influenced, Sith founder turned rogue, so its Sith influenced order, so all the members r sith influenced not Dark Jedi
need me? go to www.darthvindus.webs.com
Dark Jedi?
He was a Darth. A member of the Order of the Sith Lords. He left the Order because he saw the "true" Sith way differently and was opposed to the Rule of Two, having an ideology close to Kaan's Brotherhood. Why should the poor Sith be "demoted"? It's not like the Order of the Sith Lords is an official and only representative of the Sith "religion". Even if it was, the apostates would be still considered Sith, like Protestants are Christians. --Kir the Wizard 19:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
- This is a general warning to everyone who is involved in this reversion war over the contents of this article. If you disagree with the content of the article, discuss the issue here in public forum. Wookieepedia articles will not be turned into battle grounds. Those who seek to continue this edit war may find themselves blocked for edit warring under Wookieepedia's Three-reversion rule. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:58, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever Millenial's original intentions were, the organisation he founded were not Sith. They were simply a group of mages who used the dark side to enhance their prophetic visions. None of the Prophets are considered Sith, they all have the Dark Jedi infobox. Furthermore, the infobox has been this way for two years, I see little sense in changing it now. Jayden Matthews 20:57, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't want to argue about the nature of Prophets themselves (I don't know if they are called Sith or Dark Jedy anywhere), but Millenial was clearly a Sith (though anti-Banist) and the article itself notes about his ideology (Sith ideology before Bane). Why wouldn't he be a Sith? As for him having the same infobox as his group, I would like to argue. We have Freedon Nadd (Sith) with Naddists (Dark Jedi), Revan&Malak (Sith) with Dark Jedi (duh), Palpatine (Sith) with Dark Side Adepts (Dark Jedi), Dooku (Sith) with Dark Acolytes (Dark Jedi), Andeddu (Sith) with his cultists (Dark Jedi) and, on the other hand, Tavion (Dark Jedi) with cultists of Ragnos (Sith). There is inconsistency, but, I guess, it was pretty common for Sith Lords to create their personal quasy-Sith Dark Side organisations. Overall, demoting the rogue Dark Lord of the Sith to a mere Dark Jedi is no good! A pleasure to speak with you--Kir the Wizard 19:16, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The difference between Millenial and the examples you have provided is that they were all Sith while simultaneously leading their Dark Jedi organizations. Millenial, on the other hand, was not. He abandoned the Sith, completely and utterly. While his original intentions were to create a new Sith Empire based on the "Rule of the Strong" he did not do so. The Prophets are not considerd Sith. They never showed any inclination towards Sith philosophy and their self stated purporse was to serve "only the dark side". Yes, Millenial was a Sith, but he wasn't at the time of his death. His infobox should reflect that, same as every other character. Jayden Matthews 21:15, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Where was it stated that Millenial abandoned the Sith? Is there any information about him forsaking his Sith beliefs? He did not create the new Empire, yes, but neither did Bane. And given how different were the beliefs of the Sith during different periods of the Galaxy's history, I don't think we can label Millenial non-Sith, he was just different than others. I can't see when he denied his "Sith-ness". A pleasure to speak with you--Kir the Wizard 11:58, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- The difference between Millenial and the examples you have provided is that they were all Sith while simultaneously leading their Dark Jedi organizations. Millenial, on the other hand, was not. He abandoned the Sith, completely and utterly. While his original intentions were to create a new Sith Empire based on the "Rule of the Strong" he did not do so. The Prophets are not considerd Sith. They never showed any inclination towards Sith philosophy and their self stated purporse was to serve "only the dark side". Yes, Millenial was a Sith, but he wasn't at the time of his death. His infobox should reflect that, same as every other character. Jayden Matthews 21:15, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't want to argue about the nature of Prophets themselves (I don't know if they are called Sith or Dark Jedy anywhere), but Millenial was clearly a Sith (though anti-Banist) and the article itself notes about his ideology (Sith ideology before Bane). Why wouldn't he be a Sith? As for him having the same infobox as his group, I would like to argue. We have Freedon Nadd (Sith) with Naddists (Dark Jedi), Revan&Malak (Sith) with Dark Jedi (duh), Palpatine (Sith) with Dark Side Adepts (Dark Jedi), Dooku (Sith) with Dark Acolytes (Dark Jedi), Andeddu (Sith) with his cultists (Dark Jedi) and, on the other hand, Tavion (Dark Jedi) with cultists of Ragnos (Sith). There is inconsistency, but, I guess, it was pretty common for Sith Lords to create their personal quasy-Sith Dark Side organisations. Overall, demoting the rogue Dark Lord of the Sith to a mere Dark Jedi is no good! A pleasure to speak with you--Kir the Wizard 19:16, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever Millenial's original intentions were, the organisation he founded were not Sith. They were simply a group of mages who used the dark side to enhance their prophetic visions. None of the Prophets are considered Sith, they all have the Dark Jedi infobox. Furthermore, the infobox has been this way for two years, I see little sense in changing it now. Jayden Matthews 20:57, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Prophets - a Sith group
In the latest part of "The Imperial Warlords: Despoilers of an Empire", Prophets of the Dark Side are referred to as the "Sith splinter group" or "Sith heretics". They, including Millennial, shouldn't be labeled mere Dark Jedi just for not following the premise of the Banite sect. --Kir the Wizard (talk) 16:07, January 21, 2014 (UTC)