Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Darth Millennial

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Darth Millennial

(+5)

Support

  1. Interesting guy. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Corny name. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per Chack. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 22:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Ugh. Graestan(Talk) 23:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. From the Bridge of Chack Jadson:
    • I suggest making a pipe link to Brotherhood of the Sith from Rule by the Strong.
      • Good idea. Done.
    • "A three-eyed mutant, likely of Human descent, Millennial proved to be a talented user of the Force; he had incredible precognitive abilities, and was trained as a Cognus's Shadow Hand." A word seems to be missing at the end.
      • Addressed.
    • "But while Lord Millennial was clearly a promising student..." I'd say that's POV.
      • Addressed.
    • Finally, italicize Glove of Darth Vader in the BTS. Minor, but still.
      • It's so great I italicized it doubly! Addressed.
    • Good work. Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Toprawa:
    • Include a year for when Bane died: "who existed sometime after Bane's death."
      • We don't have one. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
        • I was too lazy to check. But, bah regardless.
    • I really dislike things like this. Same with what I've expressed on the 4-LOM nom: if it's not an IU axiom that people really don't know, avoid saying this: "Nothing is known of Lord Millennial's early life"
      • The piece about him and Cognus in Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force is full of guesswork, "allegedlies," and "assumptions," which seems to imply that IU scholars did not possess a hoard of information on him, or his origins. I'll remove it if you really wish, but I'd prefer to keep it. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
        • Good enough for me.
    • Unless "slavelord" is distinctly used in the IU text as a single word, consider breaking this up into two. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments