Shouldn't this article be labeled as "Canon" since it is from The Clone Wars? - 
The Dark Lord of the Sith 00:22, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Welcome back to Wookieepedia! Wookieepedia:FAQ; Canon, please read over for the details regarding these policies. If something is from The Clone Wars, then it potentially gets both a Legends page and a canon one. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:25, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I hesitate to edit a Wiki with so much professionalism/so many policies simply because I do not wish to make a mistake, hence my absence. I have gathered that The Clone Wars articles potentially get both types of pages, but the reason I asked was because the article presently only has a Legends page. -
The Dark Lord of the Sith 00:27, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Right. If there's only the one, it either means that somebody hasn't created the canon page yet, or it doesn't qualify per policy. That would be the case, if say, he's never referred to as "Dar" in the episode, but only in one of the Sources listed on this article and there's nothing else on the current official website that calls him "Dar." ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:21, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- I won't push this if the community does not see a reason for the "Canon" template to be added, but I will mention that he is referred to as "Dar" in-episode. I personally feel a second page would be redundant, since only Clone Wars content appears on this page, thus the entirety of it is canon. - The Dark Lord of the Sith 02:28, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- I won't push this if the community does not see a reason for the "Canon" template to be added, but I will mention that he is referred to as "Dar" in-episode. I personally feel a second page would be redundant, since only Clone Wars content appears on this page, thus the entirety of it is canon. -
- Right. If there's only the one, it either means that somebody hasn't created the canon page yet, or it doesn't qualify per policy. That would be the case, if say, he's never referred to as "Dar" in the episode, but only in one of the Sources listed on this article and there's nothing else on the current official website that calls him "Dar." ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:21, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I hesitate to edit a Wiki with so much professionalism/so many policies simply because I do not wish to make a mistake, hence my absence. I have gathered that The Clone Wars articles potentially get both types of pages, but the reason I asked was because the article presently only has a Legends page. -
Just Dar
I was wondering why we don't just move the page to Dar, instead of Dar (Trandoshan), especially given that he's the only thing here who is just called Dar. "Dar" already redirects here, so it's redundant to place (Trandoshan) after the page name, especially given that Darman and Dar-2 are the other possible Dars. I'm guessing it's like this because of Ingo Dar, but again, given the redirect already going here (And there being no disambiguation), should the page not just be called Dar? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 06:12, February 5, 2017 (UTC)