Talk: DC-15A blaster carbine

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "DC-15A blaster carbine."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Please edit

The whole canon article of the DC15-A is wrong. Please edit. The Legends article about the weapon is accurate while the canon is not.

  • What exactly is wrong, may I ask? Overlordjeff (talk) 11:33, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • The canon article shows the DC15-S instead of the DC15-A. The DC15-A is a larger rifle and the DC15-S is the smaller one. The Legends article seems to be completely accurate but the canon article is not. And it bothers me... 13:00, April 13, 2016 (UTC))
    • It was called the DC-15A in canon. It was only called the S in legends.--Tuskin38 (talk) 01:58, July 3, 2017 (UTC)

It was called a DC-15A by Boba Fett in "Death Trap", which was a typo. We know it is truly called the DC-15S blaster carbine, so I insist we keep it that way, no matter what Disney says.

  • Nope, more sources since then have called it the A, so it is the A. Also please sign your comments --Tuskin38 (talk) 01:06, February 3, 2018 (UTC)

Appearances and Sources

The "Appearances" and "Sources" sections have Canon media listed, not Legends ones. --Rakhsh (talk) 18:31, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

The talk page is labelled wrong, this is the one for the canon page. The canon page also has the legends label for some reason--Tuskin38 (talk) 18:34, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

Canon DC-15S Designation

Two canon sources, Tyrants of Lothal and Helmet Collection 22, refer to this blaster as the "DC-15S." Since the Legends version of this article's subject has that designation, it can be assumed that neither case was a typo. Should "DC-15S" be therefore listed as an alternate name for the blaster in the article's introduction/summary? Doing so wouldn't condradict canon and would be in accordance with wiki precedent. --Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Yes, it should be detailed in the article. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Brilliant, will add it. --Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)