Do you think this was possibly the schematics of the B4 battle droids? I heard no rumors on the name, but figured they would call it that due to the fact that they already built the B3s. Jedi Wolf 3:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- We don't even know if they were in the B-series. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just saying that it resembles the B2, B3, and the C-B3 if you look at it. Jedi Wolf 12:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but that doesn't mean it's a B-series battle droid. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but that doesn't mean it's a B-series battle droid. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I'm just saying that it resembles the B2, B3, and the C-B3 if you look at it. Jedi Wolf 12:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it would be awesome pictures of what the complete droid would have looked like or a list of abilities the B4 would have had. - EDWARD V
title change, any one?
I believe that the title of this article should just be Prototype battle droid. The article is written in such a manner in which it(the article) refers to the topic as the finished product, not an unfinished prototype schematic. Wilhelm screamer 02:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, but the article is really about the schematics, as is the picture. And I don't think it is written as if it refers to the topic as the finished product. Maybe if you give me a line that it has, I could revise it to make it sound more like it's referring to an unfinished prototype. Cyfiero 09:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Reading it over, I see what you mean. The article reads as if they had already produced a number of droids prior to the schematics' destruction, although in reality not a single droid was actually produced yet. I'll fix it later, but it's late, and I'm tired. Cyfiero 10:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Conjectural name
Is the name of the subject of this article conjectural? I don't recall Battlefront II referring to it by this name specifically and the article does not clarify when it is first identified as "Confederate infantry prototype". Can someone please confirm? Sol PacificusFirestorm 01:56, March 26, 2019 (UTC)
- Per the quote at the top of the article, it is refered to as a Confederade infantry prototype within the game itself. As the game was its first appearance, albiet as a hologram, a 1stID is uneccesary. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:59, March 26, 2019 (UTC)
- Oh that is my bad. I obviously had not bothered to read the quote; I should've been more attentive. Thank you for the prompt answer anyways! Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:15, March 26, 2019 (UTC)