well, if it isn't going to be deleted then it needs much more content ASDF1239
-DISCUSSION- 10:25, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
Correct me if wrong but isn't this article kind of pointless? Marcheto 15:27, June 10, 2010 (UTC) Marcheto
- Kind of, yes. But since the consensus defaulted to keep it, it'll stick around awhile. Until then, it should at least look good. I'd agree with more content. --The Great and Grand Count Mall! 04:21, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Here is the problem with this article: There have been many attempts to add new content to this page, but they have each been removed since there are few sources for it and the article remains stuck. There is no more information to add since there are few sources to reference, so the article just takes up space and, like Marcheto said, remains completely pointless. There are only two actual articles that link here. I am sure someone is willing to remove those links, so why can we not come to a consensus about redirecting it to the main Ahsoka Tano article? Kaitco 14:25, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- As indicated in the header above, this article was put up for deletion several months ago. The community consensus was to keep the article. Here at Wookieepedia, we believe that every article on a canonical subject deserves its own article, regardless of the amount of information about said subject. Some of our articles are only one or two lines, but they are kept. Wookieepedia is not paper, and therefore we do not have to be concerned about "taking up space". - Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 14:30, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Then, in an effort to help "beef up" the article, would it be wrong to move or just include some of the information from the Tano article regarding her style with her lightsaber? Kaitco 15:08, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- It would be best to leave the article alone for now. JangFett (Talk) 15:11, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- so the pathetically stunted and vapid article is effectively frozen in a limbo which prevents it from receiving either legitimate and basic additions or euthanasia through deletion/merging? it beggars belief that every edit to this page for half a year has been promptly reverted with no rationale other than "pending merging", a decision which was voted down back in may. this is completely ridiculous. ASDF1239-DISCUSSION- 10:27, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- so the pathetically stunted and vapid article is effectively frozen in a limbo which prevents it from receiving either legitimate and basic additions or euthanasia through deletion/merging? it beggars belief that every edit to this page for half a year has been promptly reverted with no rationale other than "pending merging", a decision which was voted down back in may. this is completely ridiculous. ASDF1239
- It would be best to leave the article alone for now. JangFett (Talk) 15:11, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Then, in an effort to help "beef up" the article, would it be wrong to move or just include some of the information from the Tano article regarding her style with her lightsaber? Kaitco 15:08, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- As indicated in the header above, this article was put up for deletion several months ago. The community consensus was to keep the article. Here at Wookieepedia, we believe that every article on a canonical subject deserves its own article, regardless of the amount of information about said subject. Some of our articles are only one or two lines, but they are kept. Wookieepedia is not paper, and therefore we do not have to be concerned about "taking up space". - Cavalier One
- Here is the problem with this article: There have been many attempts to add new content to this page, but they have each been removed since there are few sources for it and the article remains stuck. There is no more information to add since there are few sources to reference, so the article just takes up space and, like Marcheto said, remains completely pointless. There are only two actual articles that link here. I am sure someone is willing to remove those links, so why can we not come to a consensus about redirecting it to the main Ahsoka Tano article? Kaitco 14:25, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
Time to merge
Why is there a page for this and her shoto? This is just ridiculous, isn't it? There's no information on either page. There's already a picture of her lightsaber in Ahsoka Tano. What does this article add? I love this site, but this is just well below Wookieepedia standards. Bri-Jay Waycay 19:13, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to add that Ahsoka Tano's Shoto is even worse. Why is shoto capitalized? It says the blade is yellow in the article, but green in the infobox. I would try to improve both articles, but there is no reason to have either of them. Bri-Jay Waycay 19:22, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- This page exists because no consensus was achieved in the vote to delete the page. The voting page can be reached through the green box at the top of this page. 1358 (Talk) 19:23, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- ...which has now been upgraded to the article milestones system. Master Jonathan (Jedi Council Chambers) 19:38, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- this page exists in its current state because of a technicality preventing it from being deleted and one user removing anything that's added to it without any clear or reasonable rationale. ASDF1239-DISCUSSION- 11:32, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- this page exists in its current state because of a technicality preventing it from being deleted and one user removing anything that's added to it without any clear or reasonable rationale. ASDF1239
- ...which has now been upgraded to the article milestones system. Master Jonathan
Why isn’t it deleted and merge with the Ahsoka Tano/Legend Page
According to the Trash Compactor of Ahsoka’s lightsaber this page has enough kills to be deleted. —Unsigned comment by LegoBoi200 (talk • contribs)