Forum:TC:Ahsoka Tano's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Ahsoka Tano's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Default to keep. Grunny (talk) 09:42, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Ahsoka Tano's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 06:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I hate Ahsoka Tano more than all of you combined, but that prejudice isn't going to lead me to vote to delete. The very existence of this article demonstrates that visitors to the wiki will search for information on her lightsaber, so it deserves to be kept. At worst it should be a redirect to Ahsoka Tano. It should not be deleted outright. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:42, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • Anything killed will become a redirect. SinisterSamurai 15:12, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
      • Unfortunately, that's not what the voting options specify. If you, the creator of the TC, desired that outcome, you should have made that clear from the get go. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:13, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  2. It could be greatly improved. But after much thought, there is no reason why this should be deleted. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Upon further review, per above, as well as per Tranner on a bunch of the other current TCs. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:45, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:54, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. CC7567 (talk) 19:02, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ASDF1239Chiss Ascendancy-DISCUSSION- 21:11, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:31, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  8. No reason not to keep it. ~ SavageBob 02:45, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Keep. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:27, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  10. It can be salvaged. TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 12:43, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. SinisterSamurai 06:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Kill. JangFett (Talk) 06:02, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    Merge ASDF1239Chiss Ascendancy-DISCUSSION- 06:51, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Merge, redirect, kill, whatever. Just don't allow it the luxury of being considered an article. Trak Nar Ramble on 07:11, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. It's...a picture. With a couple extra words trying to disguise it as an article. There's nothing even said about the lightsaber itself, really. Loose it.--Bella'Mia 07:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. NAYAYEN:TALK 07:36, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Useless. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 14:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 15:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. KILL, KILL, KILL. Clone Commander Lee Talk 15:09, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:11, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. -- 1358 (Talk) 16:49, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 17:51, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. And her, too.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 18:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Per Trak, Lee, and Kasra. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:29, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Imperialles 18:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  13. There really isn't anything special about it. Graestan(Talk) 19:14, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 21:45, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  15. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:53, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Nothing special, not worth keeping. Kill. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:09, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  17. At best this should be handled like any other lightsaber article where there is nothing to say about it. Put the picture on Ahsoka's article. Owayt, it's already there. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 22:41, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  18. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 23:11, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

There's really no content there to merge. "Ahsoka Tano owned a lightsaber during the Clone Wars." is basically already covered in the Ahsoka Tano article. SinisterSamurai 07:03, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

what i am saying is that it could be added as a section to the tano article and expanded. ASDF1239Chiss Ascendancy-DISCUSSION- 08:46, May 15, 2010 (UTC)