Controversial comments?
What was it that he said, exactly, about Wookieepedia that got him in trouble with LFL? Adamwankenobi 05:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I believe it was just his acknowledgement of us after the 1 year anniversary. .... 06:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What a bunch of spoiled sports. Adamwankenobi 06:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Is Wookieepedia not liked by LFL? --School of Thrawn 101 06:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Where is this coming from? CooperTFN 07:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of liking or not liking. I just think LFL probably has reservations with its writers acknowledge fan projects that may be seen as borderline in a licensing-sense. (eg, why buy guides when you can read info for free, etc...) Doesn't mean he's currently in a LFL-"Reeducation" center or anything. Chill. QuentinGeorge 07:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, at what point has anyone insinuated that he's in an LFL-"Reeducation" center? That's a fairly drastic leap, imo. --School of Thrawn 101 07:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What are you guys talking about? Who said he was in trouble? CooperTFN 07:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Adamwankenobi --School of Thrawn 101 07:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm with Coops here... can someone tell us exactly what the shit is going on? When and how did Abel get into trouble? --Azizlight 08:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a literal sense. Adamwankenobi 11:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok... so the conversation above is essentially about nothing then? --Azizlight 12:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Right. I was only asking what remark of his got (let's try this again) "raised eyebrows" from LFL. Adamwankenobi 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- But that still seems to indicate you've heard something suggesting that something he said got raised eyebrows, which is what Aziz and I are confused about. The only other thing I can think of is that you're asking whether LFL was displeased with what he's said about this site in the past, in which case you're phrasing it horribly. =p CooperTFN 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- My query was inspired by a comment of (IIRC) User:Ozzel's I read in the transcript of the last Mofference. Adamwankenobi 20:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it was from a post at TFN. I'll see if I can dig it up. -- Ozzel 20:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- My query was inspired by a comment of (IIRC) User:Ozzel's I read in the transcript of the last Mofference. Adamwankenobi 20:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- But that still seems to indicate you've heard something suggesting that something he said got raised eyebrows, which is what Aziz and I are confused about. The only other thing I can think of is that you're asking whether LFL was displeased with what he's said about this site in the past, in which case you're phrasing it horribly. =p CooperTFN 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Right. I was only asking what remark of his got (let's try this again) "raised eyebrows" from LFL. Adamwankenobi 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok... so the conversation above is essentially about nothing then? --Azizlight 12:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a literal sense. Adamwankenobi 11:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What are you guys talking about? Who said he was in trouble? CooperTFN 07:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, at what point has anyone insinuated that he's in an LFL-"Reeducation" center? That's a fairly drastic leap, imo. --School of Thrawn 101 07:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- We can't speculate on these types of things, provide proof or the matter is a rumor. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I started this thread—wishing to know the validity of some hearsay. Adamwankenobi 04:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well for the record, it was not I who said it. ;-) -- Ozzel 04:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. Adamwankenobi 04:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well for the record, it was not I who said it. ;-) -- Ozzel 04:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I started this thread—wishing to know the validity of some hearsay. Adamwankenobi 04:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Archived?
Is there any reason why this page was archived? It wasn't very long at all. --Azizlight 06:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Off-topic conversations. - Sikon 06:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Full name
In case you've ever wondered what the G. stood for, it is Gustavo, as in Abel Gustavo Lopez Peña IV. His full name is given in a Myspace blog he posted on February 3, 2006. [1] Should his full name be given within the article, keeping the title the same, or should we leave it alone? -- Riffsyphon1024 18:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)