Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Zatt's lightsaber
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge and delete. 1358 (Talk) 20:22, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
Zatt's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)
As with Petro's lightsaber's TC, here's another. First off, this is a highly unnotable article about a highly unnotable lightsaber. Tranner recently put merge templates in the articles, but no discussions have been made. So I guess it's best to start TCs and decide.
If you find a reason to delete or keep, please feel free to comment.
Merge to Zatt
- JangFett (Talk) 19:45, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Please, for crying out loud. — DigiFluid(Whine here) 20:16, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Cade Calrayn
20:24, January 24, 2013 (UTC) - Even with their finding of the crystals, it's still a standardized construction under Huyang. Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 20:31, January 24, 2013 (UTC) - Kill ALL the lightsabers! 1358 (Talk) 20:37, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
- —MJ— Holocomm 20:58, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Death by exile.—Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 00:43, January 25, 2013 (UTC) - Menkooroo (talk) 18:57, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 19:04, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Fighting myself to say this, but this one really isn't notable enough. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 11:25, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Winterz (talk) 11:14, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
Delete
Keep
- Despite the overwhelming consensus I'd still like it known that I'm in favor of keeping all lightsaber articles. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:12, January 27, 2013 (UTC)