Forum:TC:Yoda's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Yoda's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Default to keep. Grunny (talk) 09:52, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Yoda's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 05:40, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. For the longest time, I was completely opposed to having articles on any lightsabers. But then Tommy did a great job with Lumiya's lightwhip, and others could easily follow. Then I realized that many lightsabers - if not all of them - are unique items, many with interesting histories. And lastly, I remembered an article we have on the Bimkall sector - something that doesn't even exist in-universe. If we have an article on a nonexistent sector, then I see no reason why we shouldn't have articles on lightsabers. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:37, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:56, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. CC7567 (talk) 19:02, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:26, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:32, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Grunny (talk) 00:31, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  8. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  9. ~ SavageBob 02:50, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Find some decent technical specs, go into heavy detail on the weapon's history, and keep it. Jensaarai 02:43, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  11. --TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 13:07, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. No one seems to feel it's worth keeping. SinisterSamurai 17:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:16, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Imperialles 18:20, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Also nothing special, really. Graestan(Talk) 19:14, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 21:52, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Weak kill. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:29, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  7. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Too short info, nothing special. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:07, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Now this lightsaaber could have a decent article, but still a Delete vote from me. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 22:49, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  10. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 23:10, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

Not really sure where I stand on this one. This one was specifically created for a sourcebook before it was in the movie. SinisterSamurai 05:40, May 15, 2010 (UTC)