Forum:TC:Yellow power droid

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Yellow power droid

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:59, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

Yellow power droid (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

I feel that this article is basically the same as a previous TC. The droid just sits there and does nothing in the background. I don't think that the quote is enough for us to have an article for the droid either.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:03, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Delete

  1. As nominator.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:03, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 04:12, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Fun, but still indistinguishable. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 19:43, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Let's throw it in the trash compacter. 501st dogma(talk) 19:53, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:55, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:42, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  7. "Useless machine! Useless! Useless!"- I think Vader agrees on this. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 21:09, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  8. CC7567 (talk) 00:31, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  9. —MJ— Holocomm 06:26, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  10. wat 1358 (Talk) 15:30, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Trip391 (talk) 04:29, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Darth Culator (Talk) 18:07, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

It exists and is a unique model. Bo Shuda (talk) 00:29, February 10, 2014 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: User returning from block -- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:33, February 10, 2014 (UTC))

  1. I see a quote where the author identifies the droid directly. Doesn't that make it somewhat notable? TheMasterMind (talk) 22:00, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Wasn't going to vote in this one at all, but TMM does make a point. And that's all I have to say about that. KEJ (talk) 07:24, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
  3. I think that EJ has a point about the quote not really making this droid notable, but I respectfully disagree. I think a specific mention of the droid in source material gives it enough notability to stay. Protectorate (talk) 07:28, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Generally I'd be the first to delete it but... it's unique, has someone official mentioning it specifically and the article is pretty much well built. I wouldn't be surprised if Leland or other blog author wrote about it in the future. Stake black msg 00:35, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion