This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Wookieepedia:Wookieepedians ([[Talk:Wookieepedia:Wookieepedians|talk]] - history - links - logs)
- Redundant with Special:Listusers, since it now only displays users who made at least one edit on Wookieepedia. - Sikon 15:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- it's a much more concentrated list, rather than including every vandal to ever edit a page, and it has the contribs and such. A much more focused list of people you can actually expect to find editing, rather than the vast and poorly-navigable special page. Havac 18:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree Keep, this page is more useful than the special page. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I concur. Ajrand 05:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Seems kind of pointless, and very difficult to maintain. Looks more like a guestbook than anything else. If we decide to keep, we should figure out some criteria and maintain it regularly - both a waste of time IMO. --Azizlight 06:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Ajrand :-D Wildyoda 04:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- What wildyoda and ajrand said. Let's keep it.--Windu223 00:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um... I think both of those (although serious votes) were sarcasm directed at the new ideas of "not just voting" in VfDs. See WP:ATA, Windu. And in all seriousness, I agree that if someone bothers to put themselves on the list, they are more likely to be someone you'll actually see around here. Special:Listusers is essentially worthless because it is too massive to browse effectively. Wildyoda 21:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Vote to keep. Atarumaster88 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um... I think both of those (although serious votes) were sarcasm directed at the new ideas of "not just voting" in VfDs. See WP:ATA, Windu. And in all seriousness, I agree that if someone bothers to put themselves on the list, they are more likely to be someone you'll actually see around here. Special:Listusers is essentially worthless because it is too massive to browse effectively. Wildyoda 21:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- keep!!. Listen to atarumaster88 and other users who are voting to keep it.--Windu223 23:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with the "keepers" it's a much more concentrated page - Bakse 14:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Special:Listusers sucks ass, unless I missed something and ! ! ! ! Wookieepedia is fascism! is now a legitimate user. -- I need a name (Complain here) 16:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per I need a name. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, but it could do with a major overhaul. Joker1138(Mandalore)
03:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC) - Keep KEJ 06:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, and doesn't Special:Listusers list all users of Wikia? -- Riffsyphon1024 07:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm usually a deletionist, I like obliterating pathetic articles, but now I have to put my foot down. This is outrageous. No. Keep. Darth Anxor
Sith Order 01:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC) - Keep. Greyman(Paratus) 01:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, per Havac and I need a name. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 04:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Much more helpful than Special:Listusers. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. If anything, we should be having a vote on Special:Listusers...unless that's impossible, which would just be a waste of time. -- SFH 19:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
