Forum:TC:Willow (third nomination)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Willow (third nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus; default to keep. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 17:40, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Willow (talk - history - links - logs)

Oh, come on. The carnival is over. This article has only the most tenuous connection to Star Wars, and it's not even inherent in the topic itself, but rather an April Fool's Day joke made many, many years after it was made. If anything, a subsection on the StarWars.com article might be suitable, but just because we've got a few articles from Willow, doesn't mean we need to provide Willow as a source. The Databank is the source. This is in no way helpful on a Star Wars wiki. In fact, it's downright misleading to have it here. Let's just move on, please, and let this thing die the death it needs to die. It aint even that good a movie. Thefourdotelipsis 10:48, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Death

  1. Thefourdotelipsis 10:48, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 10:53, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • Any related articles, too. --Imperialles 14:44, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. If the articles that Menkooroo mentioned are included then I vote to delete them too. NAYAYEN:TALK 12:12, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  4. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:39, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Per Nayayen. Darth KarikaPlease leave a message after the beep. *boom* 14:44, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Per Nayayen, Menkooroo, and my comments on last year's Forum:TC:Category:Andowyne. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 14:52, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Menkooroo 16:13, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Havac 05:00, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:15, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  10. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 19:58, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Life

  1. We have had this vote before. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 14:44, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Repeated TCs are tiresome and stupid. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 15:14, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Drastically rewrite, merge all the other Andowyne stuff into it, but keep. The article should be about the April Fool's Day joke, not about the film itself, but it should still exist. ~ SavageBob 20:38, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Any film that can generate six Star Wars databank entries, Star Wars or not, deserves an article. Oh wait, I said that already. Twice. jSarek 23:25, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Grunny (talk) 23:28, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 23:31, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  7. This kind of repeated nomination, in my opinion, is certainly a violation of Don't disrupt Wookieepedia to prove a point and possibly of Consensus as well. Graestan(Talk) 23:50, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • Considering that the last TC was two years ago and resulted in no consensus I think that's a tad unfair. Going by that assumption, no one should ever be allowed to CT the same idea twice. Ever. Thefourdotelipsis 00:14, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
      • It's the third nomination. I don't understand why anyone needs to so virulently oppose the very existence of a page. Just ignore it. Graestan(Talk) 21:45, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:52, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:00, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Triple jeopardy, eh? Alrighty. Dangerdan97 22:32, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  11. JangFett (Talk) 00:41, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Per Culator. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:42, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  13. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:16, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Per SavageBob, mostly. I'm not really understanding the motivation for deletion here. So it's not current anymore? That's a good reason, since we are totally a Star Wars Blog and not some sort of historical repository. SinisterSamurai 07:10, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  15. cut out the irrelevant portions though ASDF1239Chiss Ascendancy-DISCUSSION- 08:26, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Per jSarek. -- 1358 (Talk) 07:31, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Talking

Can this be amended to include deleting Elora Danan, Thorn Drumheller, Madmartigan, Sorsha, Tir Asleen, Brownie, and Andowyne as well? None of those databank entries exist on the official site anymore, and the articles seem as similarly pointless as Willow. Menkooroo 12:04, May 31, 2010 (UTC)