Forum:TC:Unknown Rodian

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unknown Rodian

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Unknown Rodian (talk - history - links - logs)

Non-notable from a non-canon source. Are we going to include articles on every minor backstop character from every LEGO Star Wars game, set, or parody? If so...shakes head...

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 03:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Graestan(Talk) 03:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Imperialles 14:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. For some reason it makes my eyes hurt... kill it. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Coming soon: A Random Guy Running Around in the Cloud City level. Unit 8311 20:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Umm…Ice Cream Man. Graestan(Talk) 16:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Of course, when Sompeetalay started that article, Mr. Hood had a name, a job, and a G-canon appearance already. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 02:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. If we had notability criteria for unidentified characters, this guy would not pass it. Besides, I think he's supposed to be Greedo. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. I don't see a contradiction in drawing the line at non-canon background characters. -LtNOWIS 16:35, 16 February 2008 (EST)
  10. Not real in Star Wars. Article not good enough. Darth Oompa Loompa
  11. Enochf 23:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Appears in a licensed source. Keep as non-canon. That's hyperinclusionism for ya buggers. KEJ 12:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Same argument as mine on TC for Darts, plus the fact he's doing something that sticks out more than "every [other] minor backstop character". Wildyoda 14:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. NighthawkLeader 05:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Non-canon but in licensed source. Eat my hyper-I. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep. We'll allow fifty bajillion articles on nobodies in the background of a canon comic, but the minute we get a character from an N-canon source we get squeamish? jSarek 05:46, 15 February 2008 (EST)
    I'd rather not have most of those articles either. —Silly Dan (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
    Me neither, but we have them as precedents and no CT track thread or TC thread has ever succeeded in deleting them, so I guess I have to get used to the idea. jSarek 09:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Ozzel 08:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)