Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified liquors
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:38, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
Contents
Unidentified liquors
- Unidentified brown liquor (talk - history - links - logs)
- Unidentified pink liquor (talk - history - links - logs)
These drinks are never identified as anything more specific than liquor, so there really isn't anything that separates them from the generic liquor article. As I doubt anyone will search for Unidentified "insert color here" liquor, I do not think redirects are needed.
Delete
- As nominator.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 22:52, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Cade
Calrayn 03:39, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
- The brown stuff is clearly Johnnie Walker. Aside from that, arguments on Forum:TC:Unidentified Mos Eisley woman lead me to believe articles like this fall below some threshold of distinguishability, notability, and non-triviality. —Silly Dan (talk) 19:29, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
- As the creator of these articles I have literally no idea what I was thinking at the time. I think I was just over excited about TOR at the time. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:05, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
Keep
- The bottle designs make them identifiable, and therefore they could be identified in the future. - Esjs(Talk) 00:23, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
- They exist, even if they don't have a name. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:37, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
- They have names, even if we still haven't translated the labels yet, and they are specific seen across several cantinas. And besides, they're referred to directly. Winterz (talk) 17:33, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Per Summerz JangFett (Talk) 18:36, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Summerz has convinced me. —MJ— Comlink 19:04, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
- 501st dogma(talk) 17:25, December 25, 2013 (UTC)
Bo Shuda (talk) 10:45, December 28, 2013 (UTC)(Vote struck, reason: Per policy: User is blocked -- —MJ— Council Chambers 03:53, January 8, 2014 (UTC))
- It may be a skin/design used and expanded on in future... Manoof (talk) 08:46, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 13:17, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
- They're there... in a game which is a canonical source. As pointed out above, they even have in-universe names which just happen to not be rendered in English. KEJ (talk) 21:44, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 22:23, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Per above. 1358 (Talk) 00:56, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
Discussion
- Can anyone interpret the labels? If they can be interpreted, they might provide a clue to if they're something special or not.—Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 14:25, December 17, 2013 (UTC)