This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Tommy-Macaroni 16:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Unidentified deceased Jedi (Kamino) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)
This dead Jedi's sole purpose in "Aftermath" is to demonstrate to the main characters just how widespread Order 66 truly was by showing another casualty. Beyond this, we know absolutely nothing about this character and they have no relevance. SilverSunbird (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete
- SilverSunbird (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- JRT2010 (talk) 20:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- We'll probably get info later on anyway. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Let's see if we can end this TC before more info comes out :P OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- We only need twenty to get there, OOM. :P JediMasterMacaroni
(Talk) 21:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC) - Wok142 (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cwedin(talk) 21:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- IFYLOFD (Talk) 21:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Erebus Chronus (Talk) 21:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Execute Order 66… again. DwartiiDelver (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Tommy-Macaroni 22:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sure we will get more information at a later time, but for the moment this is non notable. Supreme Emperor (talk) 22:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- It can be recreated when there's more information. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 23:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- 01miki10 Open comlink 23:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- No good reason to keep. If we want to state that this Jedi was not Shaak Ti, that would be better served on Shaak's page itself. VergenceScatter (talk) 00:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93
(talk) 00:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Fan26 (Talk) 00:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as of the current state of information. Also, to respond to "Keep" voters, "negative" information is a really something we should avoid. --NanoLuukeCloning facility 10:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- The episode guide is now out and there is nothing about this Jedi. ThatNerdWhoEditsWikis[talk] 13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Very speculative.
Winterz (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep
I feel like the page is important enough to be kept. ComicalNinja [Talk] 21:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)(Vote struck, reason: Per policy: Additional provisions, item 1 -- Tommy-Macaroni 10:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC))- Due to the overwhelming number of people who have voted for deletion, more reasoning than "the page is important" would be appreciated if you don't mind. JediMasterMacaroni
(Talk) 21:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- He isn't eligible to vote anyway, having only 7 mainspace edits in previous 6 months before start of this vote. 01miki10 Open comlink 23:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Due to the overwhelming number of people who have voted for deletion, more reasoning than "the page is important" would be appreciated if you don't mind. JediMasterMacaroni
- In terms of in-universe notability I agree, but I think there's a possibility that readers will want to know if the Jedi on Kamino was an established character like Shaak Ti or something, so it would be useful to have a clear page that establishes that nothing is known about them currently. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 23:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- I like the idea of keeping it as I've had many friends ask about this character or whether or not it is Shaak Ti, and I think it's nice to have a page to send users to/to link to in the Plot Description/Appearances section. I understand why this isn't going to pass though, as it is a not very notable page/character. Hoping for something in the episode guide or maybe a future Bad Batch visual dictionary. JediVahGilns (talk) 01:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments
If the episode guide for "Aftermath" includes actual information on this person, then the page may be worth keeping. As it stands now, however, it is not. SilverSunbird (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. We can easily remake this when it is notable. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)