Forum:TC:Unidentified Rodian with jacket

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Rodian with jacket

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. —MJ— Training Room 06:54, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Rodian with jacket (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

I'm aware that this is currently a GAN, but this is an utterly unnotable background character that is no better than any of the TCW unidentifieds that are currently in the TC. The fact that it's famous on Darthipedia means absolute squat.

Delete

  1. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 00:57, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. He serves absolutely no purpose, though I commend the author for being able to come up with enough for a GA-length article. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 00:59, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  3. I have to agree, after reviewing the article, it seems that all he does is walk down the street and not notice something. Doesn't seem like enough to me.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 01:01, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Man half that article is just random stuff about the Clone Wars, and how did nobody notice the typo. Bin it! <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 01:05, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Trip391 (talk) 04:09, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  6. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:40, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  7. This character does nothing except walk in front of the screen for less than a second among a crowd of dozens of other aliens. And he's not even the only jacket-wearing-Rodian in that scene... Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:47, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  8. Dear lord baby Katarn, lying there with your tiny baby shoulder pad, we hope you can use your baby Force powers to delete this horrible page. It looks terrible and the trolls are always bothering with it. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 13:55, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Only walked past, which doesn't at all make him notable. It's popularity on other fan sites has no meaning here. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:31, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Now if only we could destroy all traces of the Encyclopedia Dramatica article about it. (Be very careful if you look for that article; ED makes heavy use of popup ads, some of which have hardcore porn). —MJ— Jedi Council Chambers 22:42, February 11, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

Discussion

  • Yet somehow he's existed since 2008 here, with a beautiful discussion history and page locks. :P --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:05, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, there's a lot of stuff that has existed awhile that should be TC'd. It's just a matter of finding it. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 04:14, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
      • Sure, sure. I'm just surprised that even with it's past activity it remained out of detection. The only reason why I really took interest in this article is the humor articles, and the fact this article existed at all due to the character's blink and you'll miss him scene. Alas Louie shall not get his fame. :P --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 14:35, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • So, moving on from the ire of the above: Do I need to wait until Rodio is compacted before moving on with a replacement nomination? Just gotta keep chugging, y'know? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 19:05, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • Man, this article is so good. Check out this little nugget: "During the final decades of the Galactic Republic, a Rodian male was born into the galaxy.[1]". I feel bad having this deleted outright. Can't we keep it as a joke under the Wookieepedia namespace? Stake black msg 01:20, February 18, 2014 (UTC)