Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Adnerem
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:07, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
Unidentified Adnerem (history - links - logs - delete - protect)
The second half of the last sentence of the BTS sums up my TC reasoning: "the Adnerem was only shown in a single image with no other information about him given." I checked the source and confirmed this information to be accurate. There is no reason for this guy to have an article.--Exiled Jedi 
(Greetings) 22:43, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
Delete
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 22:43, May 30, 2015 (UTC) - "The second half of the last sentence of the BTS sums up my TC reasoning: 'the Adnerem was only shown in a single image with no other information about him given.'" Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:46, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
- 501st dogma(talk) 22:55, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Cade
Calrayn 23:34, May 30, 2015 (UTC) - The sentence highlighted by Tope sums up my vote reasoning. Manoof (talk) 06:46, June 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Trip391 (talk) 06:48, June 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Per Tope. Additionally, I cringed at the British spelling of "instalment". —MJ— Comlink 07:20, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Jorrel
Fraajic 09:24, June 3, 2015 (UTC) - We really need to scale back our proliferation of articles that consist entirely of "this $TOPIC existed. $TOPIC was seen with $CONTEMPORARY at $LOCATION during time $PERIOD. [OPTIONAL: $TOPIC said $DIALOGUE about $SUBJECT] [OPTIONAL: $TOPIC was (KILLED|WOUNDED) by $HERO] <end>" -- Darth Culator (Talk) 16:20, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:53, June 4, 2015 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 03:19, June 5, 2015 (UTC)
