Forum:TC:Tera Sinube's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Tera Sinube's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Tera Sinube's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 05:32, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. The instrument's very design and application is unique in Star Wars canon. If a unique item exists in the Star Wars universe, it deserves an article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:59, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Unique. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:17, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I think I have to agree with Toprawa. I feel that I was initially against it as some sort of Anti-TCW bias. I must admit, however, that there is no similar design identified on anyone else's belt clip. SinisterSamurai 18:20, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. On second thought, per above. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Per above. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:39, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. CC7567 (talk) 18:55, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Per Toprawa. Graestan(Talk) 19:22, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Once again, per Tope.--Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:28, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. -- 1358 (Talk) 19:28, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 20:48, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:30, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Grunny (talk) 00:34, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  15. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Per all above. ~ SavageBob 02:39, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Keep. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:23, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  18. Per the unique design reasoning. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:13, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  19. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:44, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. Definitely, kill. It's not notable. JangFett (Talk) 05:33, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 17:50, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 18:03, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

Wouldn't be opposed to creating a Cane-hilted lightsaber article, just like how we had Crossguard lightsaber before it's type was added to a WotC sourcebook. SinisterSamurai 05:32, May 15, 2010 (UTC)