Forum:TC:Template:Clonetrooper armor

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Template:Clonetrooper armor

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:37, February 26, 2014 (UTC)

Template:Clonetrooper armor (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

Another remarkably redundant template. It's used on three articles, all of which clearly state which type comes before and after.

Voting

Delete

  1. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 19:47, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. This was from an era when we thought we needed nav templates for everything. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:54, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Sure. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:26, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  4. I'm sure more things could go in this box, but I still don't see why we would need it.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 00:33, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
    This template is about "Clone trooper armor evolution" so it would be hard to list the remaining clone armors that aren't there. However, I'd be okay with a whole new template to list all their armors but as it currently stands, it's better to just get rid of it. Winterz (talk) 21:20, February 17, 2014 (UTC)
    Why do we need to delete this one and create an entirely new one? Just remove the word "evolution" from this one, and then there's no problem with adding the others. The fact that a template is used for a certain, specific scope does not prevent it from being modified to accommodate a slightly narrower or wider scope. —MJ— Holocomm 00:00, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Personally, I believe this template could be kept ande expanded to include at least the armors listed here. Maybe more variants as well, but I'm not really a clone trooper expert. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 20:03, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Per Cav. There's more articles that this can cover. —MJ— Comlink 21:56, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Katarn class could definitely be added. 501st dogma(talk) 22:06, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  4. I'm agreeing with what's been stated above. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 00:38, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  5. A nav template with remarkably untapped potential. Should be kept and expanded. KEJ (talk) 13:19, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Per Cav Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:52, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Per Cav and 501st. Stake black msg 00:25, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
  8. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 01:06, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Aight. Winterz (talk) 01:52, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Definitely per Cav.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:08, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Supreme Emperor (talk) 06:12, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Per above. 1358 (Talk) 21:03, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion