Forum:TC:Star Wars mistakes

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Star Wars mistakes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge each section into relevant articles. Gonk (Gonk!) 01:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Star Wars mistakes (talk - history - links - logs)

This has been on my watchlist since I first joined Wookieepedia, and every time I see it edited, I think to myself, "oy." Most of this can either be condensed or completely excised, and in fact each section could probably be merged into the relevant articles, which would enable us to do away with this magnet for dumbassery. Gonk (Gonk!) 12:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete

Merge each section into relevant articles

  1. With heavy editing, naturally. Gonk (Gonk!) 12:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
  2. Indeeeed. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 05:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  3. It really is crap. Graestan(Talk) 12:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  4. "Magnet for dumbassery" seems to cover it well. jSarek 16:34, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  5. Per Grae. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  6. Do we really need to know the differences between Lego Star Wars and the movies? -Milo Fett[Comlink] 22:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  7. Chack Jadson (Talk) 11:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  8. The Explanation sections remind me of those godawful "Fan Theories" on sites like Lostpedia. Urgh. Harrar 12:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  9. Yep, with heavy editing. Klow 11:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  10. Magnet for dumbassery seems to sum it up so well. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 11:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  11. Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 12:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  12. Definitely a "Magnet for dumbassery" DarthBlurrrComlink 14:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  13. As much as I've genuinely enjoyed reading this article, I've got to agree with all of the above. Doluk 22:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  14. Although it's some "cute" info, we'd best delete it. It has no place in a Star Wars encyclepeida like this --Lord EggHead (No, I am your father!) 18:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
  15. This, or deleting it entirely would be fine too. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 04:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  16. Never liked this page. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  17. Various articles lists dozens of not hundreds various continuity mistakes. This page only lists a few of them. Mauser 12:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  18. —Silly Dan (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. I say clean it up and rename it. -- Ozzel 03:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  2. I agree with Oz,(can i call you Oz?). Besides, this page is sort of like all the other pages in the Star Wars Culture category. Neat, disconnected from the rest of the wiki and completely Star Wars. It probably compares most to the 1138 (easter egg) page or the List of changes in Star Wars re-releases page. ~ Dr.Kermit 04:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  3. This should stay. Totally. Thanos6 11:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  4. Kaleep! KEJ 12:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments