Forum:TC:Star Wars inconsistencies

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Star Wars inconsistencies

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Star Wars inconsistencies (talk - history - links - logs)

This article has no sources (references) whatsoever and the prose smacks of Original Research. Not to mention that the layout is pretty messy; captions are incorrect or incomplete (e.g., not giving the actual names). Basically, this thing reeks like the SSD Continuity Debates article.

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 17:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Now we're talkin'. Graestan(Talk) 01:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. It's an interesting article, but, well, it's like pure OR. Stake black msg 01:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Though I hate to use the deletion of the SSD Continuity Debates article as a precedent for anything . . . jSarek 07:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Ugh. --Imperialles 14:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Kill it. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. I find it an interesting read, but nonetheless it doesn't belong here. Unit 8311 20:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 02:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  10. Can be better handled in the relevant BTS sections. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. More interesting than many other articles of this type. KEJ 12:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)\
  2. Did you drink your blue milk this morning? These are the kinds of articles we need to have. We're Wookieepedia and we're meant to explain things that most fans beg asking, however all information within the article SHOULD be cited. How come no one has attempted to correct this article if it is deemed inaccurate? -- Riffsyphon1024 23:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)