Forum:TC:Solo twins

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Solo twins

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Graestan(Talk) 02:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Solo twins (talk - history - links - logs)

For me, this page is unacceptable. We have very long articles for Jaina and Jacen with the information on this page. It isn't even worth it be a disambiguation page, as it is only used for 2 articles. This probably has been discussed before, but to me, this is an utterly worthless page.

Delete

  1. DC 00:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  2. It's not useful as a dis ambig because no other articles (or very few) direct there. Jacen's and Jaina's dont even direct there. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 02:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per above. Are we going to have an article for Skywalker twins now?--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 03:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Useful as disambig. jSarek 00:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  2. Definitely disambig. Especially since, if I know Star Wars, we'll have another set of Solo twins to worry about eventually... ;) Gonk (Gonk!) 00:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  3. Disambig. Greyman(Talk) 00:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per all of the above. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 01:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  5. The twins have significance as twins and not individuals in the NJO. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 09:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  6. Ozzel 09:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  7. Per everyone. Unit 8311 10:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  8. Per jSarek. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  9. Ditto -Dark Spork 03:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  10. Disambig. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
  11. —Xwing328(Talk) 02:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
  12. Bisamdig. - Lord Hydronium 05:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  13. Graestan(Talk) 11:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  14. Redirect or disambig. KEJ 09:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  15. Per Gonk and AdmirableAckbar. It should be a disambig. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Yes, it was discussed before: Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Solo twins. jSarek 00:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Hmmm....how is it useful as a disambiguation page? DC 00:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
    • For one, people might be searching for them collectively (for instance, people coming away from Gray's Anatomy. Secondly, many currently existing articles refer to them collectively, and stopping to refer to them each by name would disrupt the flow of those articles. jSarek 00:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Okay, in that case, I see your point. If it is a disambig page, we don't need to have useless or the image., wasting bandwidth. It could just state: The Solo twins, born to Han and Leia Solo, could refer to the elder twin, Jaina, or her brother, Jacen. Something along those lines, I guess. DC 01:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
        • FYI: It's not "wasting bandwidth." The image is in use elsewhere in the wiki. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 12:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)