Forum:TC:Separatist warship (Kadavo)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Separatist warship (Kadavo)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 19:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Separatist warship (Kadavo) (talk - history - links - logs)

I am aware that there are currently too many pages in the Trash Compactor already, but I feel obliged to bring this one to your attention. My question is: does any horriblly drawn Munificent-class star frigate (or any other ship for that matter) warrant a new article? You may look at the Forum:TC:Star Destroyer (Emperor's fleet) to see what people think about it. Also, it's Scott Hepburn, for Waru's sake! His drawings usually have very little to do with the realism. I say, delete this ship as obvious fanon / OR without leaving any redirects. MauserComlink 18:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Kill, without any redirects

  1. MauserComlink 18:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Too bad we can't TC Scott Hepburn himself. QuiGonJinnThere's always a bigger fish. 18:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Per QuiGonJinn. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 18:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. Artistic license does not equal new starship class. Delete fanon. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 18:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. Per Tope. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 18:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. JMAS Hey, it's me! 18:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jujiggum) 21:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. CC7567 (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. Cylka-talk- 23:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Obviously just an extremely badly drawn Banking Clan frigate.—Darthtyler (Talk) 01:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Per Tope, Darth Tyler, and Quigon. MecenarylordEnter if you dare 00:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
  15. Per... everyone. But especially QuiGonJinn. I stand by my assertion that Scott Hepburn only gets work because either a: he's sleeping with someone important at Dark Horse, b: he's the son or nephew of someone important at Dark Horse, or c: someone important at Dark Horse owes a lot of money to the Mafia and someone in the mob wants him employed there. Darth Culator (Talk) 18:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  16. Ugh. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 19:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  17. Just a really badly drawn ship, not something new. --Golden Monkey 21:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  18. IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 02:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  19. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 11:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep

Discuss

  • I also have similiar concerns about Separatist Star Destroyer. Both articles are created by the same anon, written in the style of recently banned VT-16 and provided with images by a new user, happenening to be his first contibution under that name. However, since this ship can't be easily identified with any other known class, I decided to let it live for now, unless new evidence of OR emerges. MauserComlink 18:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)