Forum:TC:Reubens Robotic Systems

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Reubens Robotic Systems

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Graestan(Talk) 00:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Reubens Robotic Systems (talk - history - links - logs)

Unsourced company which our RX-series pilot droid page has long claimed was the manufacturer of that droid line (a claim which was unreferenced, of course). Scum and Villainy has recently revealed that the droid was an Industrial Automaton product, showing that this company was likely fanon all along. jSarek 14:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Keep

Delete

  1. Delete unless someone miraculously produces evidence to the contrary. jSarek 14:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Mauser 15:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Gray Jedi 21:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per jSarek. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 01:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. IFYLOFD (And now, young Skywalker, you will die.) 02:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. Per jSarek, since such evidence may indeed exist...somewhere. Also? Good job, WOTC, failing to come up with an original sourcebook title. Why not Slimy Double-Crossin' No-Good Swindlers? Huh? Why not? Gonk (Gonk!) 00:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
  7. No-brainer. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 23:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
  8. I wouldn't want to meet one of their droids in a darkened theater. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  9. The verify tag and a CSD would've worked, but since we're here I'll indulge. Graestan(Talk) 00:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge

Comments

  • It seems there's also a Category:Reubens Robotic Systems products. I'm thinking this should also fall under the same result as this article. jSarek 14:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  • It's still on the CUSWE: wonder if it'll appear in the new Star Wars Encyclopedia...—Silly Dan (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Hmm, interesting. Bob Vitas normally doesn't make stuff up; I wonder where he got that detail. Well, if it turns out to be in the new Encyc, we can undelete, but for now, unless we find some evidence in existing media, I think my vote shall stay where it is. jSarek 08:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)