Forum:TC:Red Two (Battle of Endor)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Red Two (Battle of Endor)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:33, January 26, 2017 (UTC)

Red Two (Battle of Endor)

I think he should be deleted because all he does is say one line and that's it. —Unsigned comment by JS-4422 (talk • contribs)

Delete

  1. --JS-4422 00:10, January 10, 2017 (UTC) —Unsigned comment by JS-4422 (talk • contribs)

Keep

  1. The behind the scenes information is enough for me to consider this article notable enough to keep. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 02:55, December 14, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Exiled Jedi (talk) 03:31, December 14, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:46, December 14, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I agree with Brandon. Harshg (talk) 10:42, December 16, 2016 (UTC)
  5. The bts is quite interesting. Nivlacanator(talk) 08:27, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
  6. AV-6R7Crew Pit 08:28, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Good keep arguments presented above. KEJ (talk) 17:15, December 27, 2016 (UTC)
  8. --Lewisr (talk) 17:15, December 27, 2016 (UTC)
  9. We do have a precedent for BTS info. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:14, January 9, 2017 (UTC)
  10. Agree—there's not really any other good place to put all that info. Asithol (talk) 05:43, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
  11. Even if the BTS didn't exist, I'd vote to keep this article. The character is addressed/identified and does stuff in a film. That's plenty. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:32, January 25, 2017 (UTC)
  12. Per Toprawa. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:38, January 25, 2017 (UTC)
  13. I'd even go so far as to suggest that we could use a canon version of the article. Shayn Mikel (talk) 17:16, January 26, 2017 (UTC)

Comments