Forum:TC:Pretender

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Pretender

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete, per the Snowball Clause. jSarek 10:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Pretender (talk - history - links - logs)

Previously deleted as a common phrase with "no special canonical significance." IRC discussion suggests a TC discussion would be preferred.

Keep

Delete

  1. Like a lot of recent TC'd articles, this is a fairly common term used in a basically standard way. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. You probably could have speedy'd this one. Chack Jadson (Talk) 01:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. Utter nonsense. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  4. The template's borked, for what it's worth. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 01:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
    Should be fixed. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
    Koovy. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 01:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  5. Just a noun Enochf 04:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  6. Wow. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 13:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  7. Mauser 13:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  8. Stake black msg 17:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  9. Per Enochf MadclawShyriiwook! 00:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  10. Snowball clause, anyone? -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  11. Also per Enochf. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  12. Even I agree this is absolutely ridiculous. Havac 06:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  13. Common sense outweighs even hyperinclusionism. Come on, same exact use as real world. Wildyoda 04:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments