Forum:TC:Peeja Mobet's Holo Emporium

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Peeja Mobet's Holo Emporium
This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. JangFett (Talk) 11:51, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Peeja Mobet's Holo Emporium (talk - history - links - logs)

I found this page via Special:Random. Do we really need it? I do see this as a "worthless" article due to the nature of it.

"Peeja Mobet's Holo Emporium was a holovid emporium owned by Peeja Mobet."

Looking at the article's title, it's pretty self explanatory. The Emporium also lacks an image and all of the information is in the article. JangFett (Talk) 13:25, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

Delete

  1. JangFett (Talk) 13:25, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

Keep

  1. It's a unique location with a non-conjectural name. As much as jacktherack hates it, it's notable. Menkooroo (talk) 13:47, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    • I don't care what TFN says, honestly. This thread has nothing to do with TFN's silly opinions about us. JangFett (Talk) 13:52, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
      • Eh, I don't believe that you just happened to find this article in a random search a few hours after its notability was discussed at TFN. Regardless, this article has just about everything going for it: A name, uniqueness, multiple appearances --- there's no case to delete it at all. Menkooroo (talk) 13:55, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
        • I never seen that thread before, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. If you want, I can add it in my description above. If you don't believe me, then that's not my problem. JangFett (Talk) 14:00, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Add {{stub}}. It can probably be expanded with a little more information (though I haven't read any of those "Tales" books to know what context it was pulled from). - Esjs(Talk) 23:15, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Canonical name = article. —MJ— Jedi Council Chambers 00:03, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Name non-conjectural, it stays even if non-canon. LOST-Malachi (talk) 05:59, September 5, 2013 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: User is banned -- JangFett (Talk) 21:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC))
  4. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 06:00, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:42, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Absolutely. Let's unstubify this thing! (I think I just invented a new word). Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 14:54, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  7. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 15:25, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 15:34, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Supreme Emperor (talk) 23:34, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  10. As a unique, named thing, there should be no dispute. ~SavageBOB sig 16:17, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
  11. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 19:04, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
  12. 501st dogma(talk) 19:33, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
  13. 1358 (Talk) 09:41, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

  • I would also like to see this article tweaked a little since it's aging: Peeja Mobet. We could still mention the Emporium there but it doesn't need its own article, in my opinion. JangFett (Talk) 13:34, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    • Were it from a canonical source, I would definitely vote Keep - it IS a unique location after all. But as much as I don't like minor self-evident "unidentified" individuals/species/stuff, I think it's even worse when the subject is definitely non-canon. Do we need Indiana Jones? Absolutely. Do we need Unidentified red planet (Indiana Jones's system)? Nah, not really, that's ridiculous. It's minor, non-canon, comes from a humorous source, not going to be revisited ever and we have deleted a non-canonical Mars before. Do you think this site-wide proposal could actually work? As in, same Notability rules but established for definitely non-canon articles only, to avoid Aanxi Raanxi Laanxi's species and the like? LOST-Malachi (talk) 04:45, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
      • For the second time, Mauser, please do not distract from a forum discussion with another off-topic plug at a notability policy. If you want to discuss possible notability rules, please start a separate forum, and please keep all further contributions to this discussion focused on this specific TC subject, Peeja Mobet's Holo Emporium. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:45, September 5, 2013 (UTC)