Forum:TC:Palpatine's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Palpatine's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:47, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Palpatine's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 05:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 07:02, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Enough unique spec information from the Visual Dictionary, similar to Qui-Gon Jinn's lightsaber, that it deserves to be kept if for no other reason. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:18, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Per Tope. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:40, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:55, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. CC7567 (talk) 18:57, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Per Toprawa. Unique design. Graestan(Talk) 19:24, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:32, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Gonzalo84 19:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Per Tope. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 20:35, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 20:42, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Per Tope. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:33, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:30, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Per Tope. Grunny (talk) 00:32, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  15. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:36, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Yes, please. ~ SavageBob 02:52, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Keep. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:32, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  18. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:56, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  19. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. SinisterSamurai 05:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 07:56, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 17:56, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

Palpatine's a popular guy, and his lightsaber is cool looking, but that's not a good enough reason to give it it's own article. It probably had a section dedicated to it in a visual guide or other sourcebook. If you think that makes it notable, keep it.SinisterSamurai 05:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

At least it's a good quality article. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 07:02, May 15, 2010 (UTC)