Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Order 66 (song)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Imperators II(Talk) 13:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Order 66 (song) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)
According to the Notability policy for music, "Note that articles are not to be granted to individual tracks on soundtracks." Since this track does not meet the other listed criteria for a page, it is not notable for an article. Also we don't have articles for anything else in the Visions soundtracks. Rsand 30 (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete
- Rsand 30 (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 22:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Enderdrag64 (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- If it isn't notable under policy, then aye Fan26 (Talk) 00:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Loqiical (talk) 08:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- OOM 224 20:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- —spookywillowwtalk 20:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dentface (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola 02:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep
Comments
- It was pointed out that the song has IU info (confirming the flashback from "Tatooine Rhapsody" is set during Order 66), however in other instances (like when Saberjowl was first identified), we just source the soundtrack and the song itself is not notable. Rsand 30 (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Can somebody confirm whether this is really a song or just an instrumental music piece please? Because if it really is a song then methinks it should be exempt from the policy, which was intended for instrumental music pieces anyway. OOM 224 19:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)