Forum:TC:Obi-Wan Kenobi's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Obi-Wan Kenobi's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:17, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Obi-Wan Kenobi's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article. SinisterSamurai 06:23, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. SinisterSamurai 06:23, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. There's an entire novel centered around it... Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 06:25, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:27, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Per Samurai, the page needs some serious work. But it should definitely stay.--Bella'Mia 07:04, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. NAYAYEN:TALK 07:36, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Grunny (talk) 07:40, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
    --$ Jacensolo148 $ 09:27, May 15, 2010 (UTC) definitely keep - I made the page! (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: Not enough mainspace edits -- Grunny (talk) 09:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC))
  7. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 15:04, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. -- 1358 (Talk) 16:50, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:42, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:55, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Does need a fair amount of work, but my vote is still here. CC7567 (talk) 18:59, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Needs help, but considering there are books written about it, then I vote keep.--Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:12, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Per Xicer9. Graestan(Talk) 19:15, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  14. --Gonzalo84 19:45, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:28, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Who's it hurting? (Besides Ponda Baba.) ~ SavageBob 02:43, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Keep. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:25, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  18. It's in serious need of cleanup, but we can do that. Besides, its still a notable weapon with a lot of history behind it. Jensaarai 18:33, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  19. Though the article should be probably cut in half, if not more. It is supposed to be focused on the lightsaber, not Kenobi's exploits in general. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:03, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  20. Needs a bit of cleanup, but no need to delete. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:33, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. It may have whole books about it, but that's OOU. Wookieepedia is written as an IU encyclopedia; notability IMO should therefore be IU, and I don't see any evidence of IU notability. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:07, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Per Jonathan. --Imperialles 18:09, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment

Hesitant. The one has whole books named after it, but the page needs hardcore attention. SinisterSamurai 06:23, May 15, 2010 (UTC) --[[User:Jacensolo148|$User:Jacensolo148$]] 19:03, May 20, 2010 (UTC) Thanks guys! My page looks to be saved. Try striking this text (again) if you want, but you can still read it, duh to administrators!