Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Nightsister Riding Rancor Defense
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete (via the Snowball Clause). jSarek 07:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Nightsister Riding Rancor Defense (talk - history - links - logs)
This basically describes an in-game mechanic for Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption. We do not, for example, have an article on Chewbacca's ability to hijack enemy vehicles, which is seen in both the expansion and its predecessor.
Delete
- Goodwood
(Alliance Intelligence) 20:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC) - Shoo! Stake black msg 20:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Havac 22:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Useless. --Imperialles 22:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Jeez. Graestan(Talk) 03:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even worth a merge. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 03:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC) - Snowball clause? -- Darth Culator (Talk) 04:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Panaka Blast! -- Ozzel 03:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Merge with Nightsister
Keep
Comments
Is it a conjectural name, or is it referred to as Nightsister Riding Rancor Defense? -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's the thing, I can't remember it ever being shown in the game itself. Nightsister units can bind local rancors to their will to form mounted Nightsister units, but they're little more than "captured vehicles" as stated above. So the answer would probably be yes, it's conjectural, though it could theoretically be a good way to use the units in-game.--Goodwood (Alliance Intelligence) 20:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)