Forum:TC:New Order (Mandalorian)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:New Order (Mandalorian)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 12:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

New Order (Mandalorian) (talk - history - links - logs)

Blatant speculation that has little to no basis in its so-called "appearances" (no, it's not in KotOR II). Someone with the other source should be able to confirm whether this is more than just a passing note.

Keep

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 20:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. -- I need a name (Complain here) 20:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete it. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 21:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Considering that it's not even mentioned in its one actual source... - Lord Hydronium 21:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Unit 8311 07:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Per Lord Hydronium. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. Should've been just a speedy delete. No mention = straight up fanon I would say. Cull Tremayne 20:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  8. Graestan(Talk) 04:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

The mention in the Taris Holofeed is "This medium of the Old Order will now be deactivated." -- I need a name (Complain here) 20:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

From deleted talk page

Unless Count Dooku quoted the term "Old Order", please kindly remove the fanon label. Thank you. Jedi Wolf 20:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Count Dooku has nothing to do with this article, which is fanon because everything is "possibly" or "most likely", ie it's conjecture and speculation at best and fanon at worst. -- I need a name (Complain here) 20:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

There, now it's possibly fanon. (lol) Jedi Wolf 20:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

  • No, actually, it's worse. Now it's gone from being a bunch of unfounded assumptions to a bunch of unfounded assertions. -- I need a name (Complain here) 20:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

How exactly? I put sources. And why would they call the Republic the Old Order without a New Order? You can't call anything old without something new to replace it. Jedi Wolf 20:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)