Forum:TC:Lumiya's lightwhip

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Lumiya's lightwhip

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:02, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Lumiya's lightwhip (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 06:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. SinisterSamurai 06:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Perfect example of why lightsaber articles should be kept and how one can be done properly. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. JangFett (Talk) 06:07, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. No-brainer. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 06:08, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Per Toprawa. Couldn't have said it better.--Bella'Mia 07:22, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Per Tope. NAYAYEN:TALK 07:34, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Grunny (talk) 07:37, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Per Tope. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 14:59, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. You can't kill a featured article. Eh, yes, you can. Put per Tope. -- 1358 (Talk) 16:56, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Definitely keep.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 17:43, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 17:49, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  13. With the possible exception of Anakin Skywalker's second lightsaber, this is the strongest keep of any of these. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:24, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  15. CC7567 (talk) 19:03, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Wanting to kill this would be a complete joke. All one needs is the ability to read to see it deserves to be kept. Graestan(Talk) 19:13, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Per Tope. That and the whole "featured article" thing. =] --Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:15, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  18. --Gonzalo84 19:45, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  19. It quite clearly has information that couldn't be merged anywhere else. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:28, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  20. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:30, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  21. Agree with Tope. ~ SavageBob 02:38, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  22. Keep. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:22, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  23. Keep, its a bloody work of art. Jensaarai 18:15, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  24. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:57, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  25. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:05, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. Imperialles 07:54, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

I put this up because I said I would. I expect it to keep at an incredibly high rate. SinisterSamurai 06:06, May 15, 2010 (UTC)