This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
But I arbitrarily made it into a redirect to Gamorrean instead. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
List of Gamorreans (talk - history - links - logs)
I say delete because it is redundant. And yes, I even verified that everyone on the list was also in the category. -- Ozzel 05:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, there is no need to list this information twice --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'd agree with the delete. At the very least, it should be a section in the Gamorrean article as Known or Notable Gamorreans. - Esjs(Talk) 03:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete–redundant. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral–I'd like to point out that this is one of many such redundant lists. If this goes, the rest need to go.--Lord OblivionSith holocron
16:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC) - Delete this and all the other redundant lists. Ajrand 01:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
