This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:56, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Contents
Koros Warship (Unification Wars) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)
A whole lotta JustinFannon. Generic group article for a bunch of different types of ships.
Delete
- Cade
Calrayn 19:20, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- 501st dogma(talk) 19:34, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 19:46, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- 1358 (Talk) 20:02, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that it's a group shot just kills me. Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 20:55, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Brandon Rhea(talk) 20:56, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- I prefer the term Gannon. Justin Gann Fanon. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:19, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Trip391 (talk) 05:21, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Per Tope. —MJ— Training Room 06:30, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
- He prefers Ganon, Tope. Jorrel
Fraajic 01:36, October 22, 2014 (UTC) - Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:05, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
- IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:51, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep
Discussion
What is JustinFannon? I get the implication (fanon, obviously) but not the whole context. I've seen this issue with people saying VTfanon as well. We don't all know insider-talk like this, and it would be helpful if TC's were fully explained so everyone can be aware of what the suggested issue is. That way we can make an informed vote. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea(talk) 19:47, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
- JustinGann and VT-16 are both famous for creating tons and tons of articles filled to the brim with speculation, specifically ship-related articles (in the case of VT, at least). It kinda amuses me that we still keep finding so-called VTfanon years after the guy has been banned. So basically, it means the articles are usually based completely on assumptions and speculation. 1358 (Talk) 20:02, October 19, 2014 (UTC)