Forum:TC:Kingdom-come

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Kingdom-come

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge with List of phrases and slang. jSarek 08:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Kingdom-come (talk - history - links - logs)

Just a phrase.

Keep

Delete

  1. An oddly hyphenated variation of a standard English phrase: doesn't even need to be added to the slang list as far as I'm concerned. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Dear God. I've actually been following more than one user around deleting nonsense articles like these that they create. Graestan(Talk) 00:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC) EDIT: Moved my vote. Couldn't imagine a column Culator was party to that didn't support outright deletion. :P Graestan(Talk) 00:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
    • To be fair, this one is actually somewhat notable in that it's a very specific real-life religious concept. I might actually support keeping it if it was more than a throwaway line or if someone actually put some work into it, which is why I'd rather see it hang around in some form. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 03:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Because these types of articles are and will always be pure bullshit, especially if they're made by a serial albeit subtle fanoneer. I haven't read the issue, but unless right after the article's quote Biggs turned around and said, "by the way, guys, in case anyone doesn't know what 'kingdom-come' means, it's..." then there is zero content for the article that isn't pure fanon and doesn't consist of "Kingdom-come was something Biggs Darklighter said." We don't know if Kingdom-come is an actual place, a metaphorical or religious place, or mere slang. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge with List of phrases and slang

  1. Shouldn't be on its own Enochf 23:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. JMAS Hey, it's me! 00:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Should have been done without this formality. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. As per Culator. Dr.Kermit(The Doctor is in) 02:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. Truth be told, quite a few more of these new articles need to be given the same treatment. Cull Tremayne 06:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. Earned my vote. Mauser 06:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  7. QuiGonJinnThe ability to speak does not make you intelligent.Quigonheadshot 15:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  8. Works for me. Havac 21:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  9. Per Culator and Cull. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 21:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  10. Also per Culator and Cull. Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  11. I need a name (Complain here) 14:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  12. I'm always for merging rather than seeing this get speedied again when somebody else comes across it again in the issue. Wildyoda 17:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  13. IFYLOFD (And now, young Skywalker, you will die.) 06:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  14. I'll support a merge before deletion, especially with phrases, and that is just what this is: a phrase. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments