Forum:TC:Ki-Adi-Mundi's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Ki-Adi-Mundi's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Default to keep. Grunny (talk) 10:17, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Ki-Adi-Mundi's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 06:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. For the longest time, I was completely opposed to having articles on any lightsabers. But then Tommy did a great job with Lumiya's lightwhip, and others could easily follow. Then I realized that many lightsabers - if not all of them - are unique items, many with interesting histories. And lastly, I remembered an article we have on the Bimkall sector - something that doesn't even exist in-universe. If we have an article on a nonexistent sector, then I see no reason why we shouldn't have articles on lightsabers. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:37, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. CC7567 (talk) 19:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:32, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Just because an article is currently poorly written does not mean the article should be deleted whole cloth. Some of the complaints below could be addressed with a good rewrite of the article. ~ SavageBob 02:45, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  7. No need to kill lightsaber-articles unless they're in a very poor shape, and have nothing special to say about the lightsaber. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:28, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  8. It can be saved!TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 12:56, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. SinisterSamurai 06:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 14:37, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 17:57, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Imperialles 18:12, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. The article is 99% about Mundi and his fighting style, not about the lightsaber. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 18:15, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Very fanonish speculation, as well. The lightsaber itself is just a damn lightsaber. Graestan(Talk) 19:16, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 21:56, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Killify. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:26, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Unlike the other noms, there's nothing unique about Ki's lightsaber. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:50, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Per Fiolli. Darth KarikaPlease leave a message after the beep. *boom* 19:46, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Per JMAS and Grae. -- 1358 (Talk) 18:38, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
  12. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:04, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  13. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 23:06, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Komment

Ki-Adi-Mundi is a pretty cool guy, but his lightsaber page is not. :( SinisterSamurai 06:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)