Forum:TC:KOTOR 15 spacecraft

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:KOTOR 15 spacecraft

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge articles into Republic Navy. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Conjectural spacecraft from Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 15: Days of Fear, Part 3

This TC applies to the following articles:

  • Republic yellow Lego freighter
  • Republic fountain pen spacecraft
  • Republic 9-volt battery frigate
  • Republic Four Millennia BBY Falcon light freighter
  • Republic paper plane wing spacecraft
  • Republic twin exhaust khaki jet fighter

Laughably poorly named conjectural articles who serve no purpose on their own. Merge them into Republic Navy, I say. Precedent: Nagai fleet. --Imperialles 21:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge into Republic Navy

  1. Imperialles 21:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  3. Imp, I didn't realize how much I missed you while you were in the army until this moment. :P Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  4. If the Campaign Guide didn't give them proper names, chances are no source will do it soon. And who came up wich such names anyway? MauserComlink 21:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Well, I'm guessing Sikon, who created the pages. - Esjs(Talk) 23:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  5. Could have been done without all the red tape. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 21:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  6. - Esjs(Talk) 23:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  7. Whoever wrote those articles needs to polish their vocabulary or go back to school. Articles like these lower our standards. Andykatib 23:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Whatever happened to WP:NPA? - Sikon 01:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Haven't I deleted that yet? -- Darth Culator (Talk) 03:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
        • Not yet, you haven't, DC. Andy, the user who created these is Russian, and not a native English speaker, and the names were actually typical of our unnamed-article naming practices of the time, which included such tongue-twisters as the infamous Sydney Pollack Super Saxton Star Dreadnought. jSarek 02:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  8. Grunny (Talk) 00:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  9. JMAS Hey, it's me! 02:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  10. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  11. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 03:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  12. What a bunch of crappy titles. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  13. It seems that my last attempt to get rid of these articles' titles got to the right person. Thanks Imp. ;) Tyber J. Kenobi's Droid 10:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  14. If more than "They were at Camp Three" can be said about them then keep but I don't think such info will appear. Ever. NayayenOld Republic military symboltalk 19:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  15. I Vote delete them! What the heck kind of articles are these? Be gone! Gmalek 21:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  16. Per Nagai Fleet precedent. jSarek 02:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  17. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 08:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  18. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 10:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  19. In my opinion, things that just exist somehow, where there's no background story given, should usually not have their own articles. This here is one such case. Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 12:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  20. IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 03:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  21. Thank you Sikon! *rimshot*. Well if more info comes out on them, we then give them articles (with canonical titles at that), however keep in mind we have thousands of one line stubs because that's all we know about certain things and remember how we hate lists? -- Riffsyphon1024 07:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  22. Yes. Cylka-talk- 02:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep