Forum:TC:K'Kruhk's hat

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, so the article will be grudgingly kept. Thefourdotelipsis 07:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Rationale for nomination

Let's get rid of this novelty article. Any relevant info should be part of the K'Kruhk article. --Imperialles 21:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Merge, then redirect for above-stated reasons. --Imperialles 21:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The power of the hat is not necessarily dependent upon K'Kruhk. Once he is long gone, the hat will live on. -- Ozzel 21:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
    • There's no evidence of that… --Imperialles 21:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
      • The Hat doesn't need evidence. -- Ozzel 21:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep because it is a distinct item that has gained it's own fan following. Wildyoda 21:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge, then redirect as per the rationale at the top. Greyman(Paratus) 21:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. On the one hand, in-universe, the hat isn't terribly notable. On the other hand, out of universe, it has a distinct and clear notability, one that has not gone unnoticed by the creators. jSarek 21:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP 'COS KATARN SAYS SO. PRAISE KATARN!!!! Aybfreak 22:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, given what is already in Category:Clothing. As a type of hat, along with its fan base, I think it might deserve its own article. —Unsigned comment by Azizlight (talk • contribs)
  • Merge, then redirect - JMAS 00:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge, then redirect - I don't think we need to pay as much fanservice as Dark Horse seems intent on doing with their latest tomfoolery. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 03:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Independently notable. Havac 04:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep because of its status in the fan community. KEJ 11:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge, with a vengeance. It's a BTS note at best. At worst, it's a passing mention. Bugger off to goddamn hell, in my opinion. Thefourdotelipsis 14:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per Havac. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 15:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge. Though I agree with the notability of the hat, there is no reason this can't be part of K'Kruhk's article. Green Tentacle (Talk) 00:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge - Like above, this hat is pretty cool, but putting that aside, this article is one paragraph about a hat. I mean, come on. Merge it with the main K'Kruhk article, and I personally wouldn't even redirect, but delete altogether--Aabsdu 14:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge. Per GT. Unit 8311 14:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Way too notable OOU. Din's Fire 997 02:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)