This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Atarumaster88 
(Talk page) 15:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Jedi Protector (talk - history - links - logs)
Seems to be making something out of nothing. A protector who is a Jedi is not necessarily a "Jedi Protector." Unless there is an actual source with a use of this term, I don't see why it should have an article. Delete.-- Ozzel 03:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- The precedent for this kind of thing seems to be keeping only for continuous and uniform use, which this does not have. Delete this silliness. Wildyoda 20:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, by all means. KEJ 10:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Wildyoda. jSarek 13:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete this version of the article: make it about the Peter M. Schweighofer story in Star Wars Galaxy Magazine 13. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Silly Dan. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 16:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC) - Delete because I like to delete things. That's a reason. So Sikon can't unilaterally strike it. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 19:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)