This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No Consensus. Default to keep. Grunny (talk) 04:44, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
Contents
Jedi (disambiguation) (talk - history - links - logs)
Unnecessary disambig page. First off, the only current link to it is a User's page. Secondly, I doubt anybody is going to type "Jedi" into the search box to get to anything other than the Jedi page itself, because that's just common sense. I mean, who is going to search "Jedi" in hopes of finding something like "Jedi Temple Hangar" or "Jedi war mount" or "Jedi Apprentice: The Dark Rival?" The only other pages people might be looking for are Jedi Order, Jedi Knight, Jedi (duuvhal), or Jedidiah, which are all covered by a {{youmay}} template on the Jedi page itself. So what's the point in having this disambig? Jonjedigrandmaster (We seed the stars) 18:39, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
- Jonjedigrandmaster
(We seed the stars) 18:39, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:40, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- -- 1358 (Talk) 18:42, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- With vengeance. Very quickly. Spill blood. Painfully. Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:22, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- CC7567 (talk) 05:56, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Oooh, a list! Kill it with fire! Darth KarikaPlease leave a message after the beep. *boom* 14:01, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Because over two-thirds of that stuff should not even be on that page. This is one of the few cases where I favor a {{youmay}} over the disambig. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:44, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Pranay Sobusk ~ Talk 17:01, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Imperialles 10:11, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
- We seriously have this? That's like having "Disambiguation (disambiguation)." Trak Nar Ramble on 05:51, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Keep
- The {{youmay}} should just be pointing to this, rather than four different articles. Havac 05:40, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Hav, but trim it down to things people would actually be looking for. - Lord Hydronium 05:58, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Hav and Hydro. jSarek 06:04, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Remember the context for each kept blurb. NaruHina Talk
02:11, April 3, 2010 (UTC) - Trim it down big time. —Xwing328(Talk) 03:35, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Havac, Hydro and Xwing. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:01, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Per GT. Graestan(Talk) 21:27, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Per them ^ - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 17:20, April 8, 2010 (UTC) - Per everyone. Cylka-talk- 20:01, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
It could definitely use a good bit of trimming but a given that there are many disambiguations people may sincerely be looking for keeping a heavily trimmed page would be nice.-Drfaustxxx 13:24, April 9, 2010 (UTC)(Vote stricken per policy. -- 1358 (Talk) 13:31, April 9, 2010 (UTC))
- The Jedi article needs a {{Youmayd}} tag to point to this. Per Hydro also. Nayayen—TALK 11:02, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
The ever-present "epic meh"
Comments
- In addition to things people might actually go there looking for, Star Wars: Jedi. - Lord Hydronium 21:45, April 3, 2010 (UTC)