Forum:TC:Gizor Dellso's Remnant Navy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, feel free to renominate. - Sikon 13:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC).

Gizor Dellso's Remnant Navy (talk - history - links - logs)

This page would be a Vfd for Dreams of a Galaxy as well, and to get rid of any mention of Gizor Dellso's Remnant Navy in other articles (such as Confederate Navy, Battle of Mustafar, Navy, and Confederate Remnants).

Keep

  1. Seems conjecturally named canon, per BF II. After all, we have articles on the conjecturally named Nagai ships. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 16:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. I agree --Jedimca0 (<insert name here>, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. After seeing the updated version, this conjecture is better. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. It's a canon group of ships with a conjectural name. Welcome to Wookieepedia. Havac 21:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Why would we want to delete this? Please, someone explain. Chack Jadson 21:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. I remove my objections now, as long as no one gets carried away replacing Confederate Remnants links everywhere else again. Wildyoda 22:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. Cutch 05:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  8. Per Atarumaster88. Adamwankenobi 18:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    The only thing in the article I can find that is not confirmed by BF II is that the fleet was scavenged by pirates and the Empire. There is nowhere in BF II that this is stated. That should be taken out, but the article itself should stay.Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters)(Leader of the Tigers) 00:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC) (Stricken by Evir Daal as per Forum:CT:Single issue voters)
  9. Same old argument: it's there, it's canon. KEJ 22:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. Yep, it's canon. There is nothing you can do to stop things from being canon. Keep.--Windu223 00:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
    I don't see a need to delete this. - Esjs 06:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)) (Stricken by Evir Daal as per Forum:CT:Single issue voters)
  11. Per Windu223 and Hobbes15. —Silly Dan (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Why should we delete this? Darthchristian (Hey!) 21:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
    I thik it is okay, but we had another page like this a few months ago did we? Or did we? Why should we delete this if these people will just do make this page again? I mean arent they. But I do agree that the last sentence should be deleted. User:69.181.58.213 09:43 30 April 30 2007 (UTC)
  13. Darth Seth 18:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge

Redirect

Delete

  1. I can't find anything to suggest that it's canon, so I'd say it's fanon. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. I need a name (Complain here) 15:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. ATATatarismall.png 15:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 15:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
    I'm tired of it popping up to replace things that are canon or are at least DEFINITELY canon while this is not. Wildyoda 01:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. SFH 01:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
    I couldn't find anything in the sources given. Conjecture at best. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. Kuralyov 04:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  8. "Star Wars: Battlefront series, for your part in the assassination of Star Wars canon, and for the murder of taste and common sense, I condemn you to death!" Evir Daal
Thus die all traitors... Evir Daal 07:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • It seems to be semi-canon sprinkled with conjecture and fanon. -- I need a name (Complain here) 15:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Uh...where are the canon elements from? They're certainly not from the Battlefront II Prima Guide...and I can't for the life of me remember them in the game...so I'm curious where they're meant to be from? —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Semi-canon is that he had a bunch of ships that got destroyed in the Battle of Mustafar. -- I need a name (Complain here) 15:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
        • Well, then there's something to have an article about, isn't there? Just take out whatever bits are fanon. Havac 03:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
          • Taken out. You guys may want to look at the article again. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 14:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
            • How do we know the fleet was owned by Gizor Dellso? How do we know it was left over from the CIS? Everything about it is conjectural. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 18:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
              • If this is not deleted, what happens to Dreams of a Galaxy? That definitely is fanon. Chack Jadson 22:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
                • Bring it up for its own proper Vfd. —Xwing328(Talk) 21:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • My vote was stricken? "How rude!" Ok, I can understand the reasoning from Forum:CT:Single issue voters, but 50 useful edits? Harsh man! I thought this was a friendly place. I just want to add my point of view. Guess I better get going on those useful contributions. - Esjs(Talk) 00:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Yeah, there's been some debate that we didn't realize just how harsh it was; we've been forced to strike votes from several otherwise normal contributors lately that no one expected to fall short of the requirement. However, for the time being, the policy stands. Feel free to unstrike once you get the mainspace contributions up to par. jSarek 04:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
      • We've had some past issues. Sorry, butif you really mean to contribute (which it seems like you do), it should not be a problem. Chack Jadson 14:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)