Forum:TC:Galaxy Destructor

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge with superweapon, like we did with similar articles.. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Galaxy Destructor (talk - history - links - logs)

If we deleted Nostril of Palpatine, why keep this?--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 04:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Per Hyrdonium. -- I need a name (Complain here) 21:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Nooo! I don't want these to mess up the Superweapon page! Evir Daal 08:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For what it's worth. KEJ 08:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge

  1. With Superweapon--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 05:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. I guess the Nostril of Palpatine precedent was for Merge, not delete. jSarek 20:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Merge with Superweapon --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. As above. --Azizlight 22:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Atarumaster88 20:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Merge with superweapon or some List of hypothetical subjects thing —Xwing328(Talk) 17:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Per precedent. Havac 17:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Merge. Darth Seth (Chewbacca lives!)

Redirect

Delete

  1. Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 04:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Thefourdotelipsis 04:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
    If we already deleted Nostril of Palpatine, the precedence for these two is set regardless of the CTs. jSarek 20:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. The quote made me laugh, but it's really irrelevant. Unit 8311 20:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Imperialles 20:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Per Oblivion.--Windu223 20:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. It's just an idea! We shouldn't have articles that don't exist in real life or the Star Wars universe. Darthchristian (Hey!) 21:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Stake black msg 01:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Protest abstention on the grounds that we should wait for CTs on subjects to resolve instead of bringing all the specific instances we don't like to their own vote. It's like asking both your parents for something and hoping that even if one says no, the other will say "yes". - Lord Hydronium 04:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Since this and Nova Colossus are effectively identical, they should've been nominated together. -LtNOWIS 01:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)