Forum:TC:Darts (game)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Darts (game)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus.—Silly Dan (talk) 03:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Darts (game) (talk - history - links - logs)

Per the argument put forth for Unknown Rodian's TC; non-notable from a non-canon source. Darts is only seen in this one instance and is a minor appearance at best.

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 03:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. I think I might have heard of darts in EU somewhere, but until and unless a source can be found, KILL KILL KILL. Graestan(Talk) 03:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Imperialles 14:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Graestan, KILL KILL KILL. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. If this stays, we'll have a Tennis article soon. Unit 8311 20:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Analysis complete Enochf 05:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Appears in a licensed source. Keep as non-canon. That's hyperinclusionism for ya buggers. KEJ 12:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. I'm tired of this purge. I don't understand how something can be "non-notable" if it appears in a licensed source. Non-canon doesn't mean non-existent here. Wildyoda 14:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. NighthawkLeader 05:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. What's the point of using the non-canon template then if we delete everything that isn't canon? -- Riffsyphon1024 23:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Per Riff and Wildyoda. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 23:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Per Hobbes. jSarek 05:44, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  7. Ozzel 00:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

  • I must have missed something. Where are these in-universe notability requirements that are being alluded to (and used as a basis for recommending this article's deletion)? -- Ozzel 00:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
    • We don't have any, exactly. —Silly Dan (talk) 03:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)