Forum:TC:Darth Zannah's lightsaber

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Darth Zannah's lightsaber

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Grunny (talk) 10:11, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Darth Zannah's lightsaber (talk - history - links - logs)

Okay, this was one of several articles placed in the trash-compactor as a group. The result of the group compacting attempt was No Consensus. Brought up here and here, in an attempt to make a site-wide policy. The policy in the works seems to effectively place each in the TC anyway. So here they are, individual Trash-Compactors for each article.SinisterSamurai 05:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

  1. For the longest time, I was completely opposed to having articles on any lightsabers. But then Tommy did a great job with Lumiya's lightwhip, and others could easily follow. Then I realized that many lightsabers - if not all of them - are unique items, many with interesting histories. And lastly, I remembered an article we have on the Bimkall sector - something that doesn't even exist in-universe. If we have an article on a nonexistent sector, then I see no reason why we shouldn't have articles on lightsabers. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:37, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:43, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Dear Tommy, make this one look good too. Thanks, Management. :P Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Consider me a recent convert. Chack Jadson (Talk) 18:55, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. CC7567 (talk) 19:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. This one seems notable enough to me--Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 19:04, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Its notable enough.--Gonzalo84 19:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  8. I tend to think an object that can't be merged into a single other article is worthy of an article of its own. In this case it couldn't. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:24, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Borsk Fey'lya Talk 14:29, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Grunny (talk) 00:34, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  11. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  12. .peeK ~ SavageBob 02:50, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Assloads of unique information. Havac 09:00, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Weak keep. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:08, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  15. There's no real need to kill this one. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:53, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  16. --TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 12:54, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Actually, keep this one. It's an individual item from a game. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:03, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  18. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 23:08, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Kill

  1. SinisterSamurai 05:44, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Nothing that can't be said in our articles on Zannah or the crystal. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 14:38, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 17:58, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 18:00, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Who didn't have a double-bladed lightsaber way back when? Graestan(Talk) 19:12, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Imperialles 19:13, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Weak kill. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:29, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Komment